cveboard RSS feed

CVE-2026-31503

CVE.org · Published

Historical CVEsJSONAI instructions

Record status
Published
Identifier year (not publication year)
2026
Source publication
Source updated
Imported by cveboard
Source snapshot
cve_2026-10-24_midnight_baseline ·

Plain text

CNA source text (English)

udp: Fix wildcard bind conflict check when using hash2

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: udp: Fix wildcard bind conflict check when using hash2 When binding a udp_sock to a local address and port, UDP uses two hashes (udptable->hash and udptable->hash2) for collision detection. The current code switches to "hash2" when hslot->count > 10. "hash2" is keyed by local address and local port. "hash" is keyed by local port only. The issue can be shown in the following bind sequence (pseudo code): bind(fd1, "[fd00::1]:8888") bind(fd2, "[fd00::2]:8888") bind(fd3, "[fd00::3]:8888") bind(fd4, "[fd00::4]:8888") bind(fd5, "[fd00::5]:8888") bind(fd6, "[fd00::6]:8888") bind(fd7, "[fd00::7]:8888") bind(fd8, "[fd00::8]:8888") bind(fd9, "[fd00::9]:8888") bind(fd10, "[fd00::10]:8888") /* Correctly return -EADDRINUSE because "hash" is used * instead of "hash2". udp_lib_lport_inuse() detects the * conflict. */ bind(fail_fd, "[::]:8888") /* After one more socket is bound to "[fd00::11]:8888", * hslot->count exceeds 10 and "hash2" is used instead. */ bind(fd11, "[fd00::11]:8888") bind(fail_fd, "[::]:8888") /* succeeds unexpectedly */ The same issue applies to the IPv4 wildcard address "0.0.0.0" and the IPv4-mapped wildcard address "::ffff:0.0.0.0". For example, if there are existing sockets bound to "192.168.1.[1-11]:8888", then binding "0.0.0.0:8888" or "[::ffff:0.0.0.0]:8888" can also miss the conflict when hslot->count > 10. TCP inet_csk_get_port() already has the correct check in inet_use_bhash2_on_bind(). Rename it to inet_use_hash2_on_bind() and move it to inet_hashtables.h so udp.c can reuse it in this fix.

Scoped product and version facts

Fix information unknown; no fixed version is derived here. Missing information does not prove that no fix exists.

Exploitation unknown; this catalogue does not assess exploitation.

Linux

Vendor
Linux
Product
Linux
Platforms
Unknown
Default status
unaffected
Linux · Scoped product and version facts
Version (version)Status (status)Version scheme (versionType)Exclusive end (lessThan)Inclusive end (lessThanOrEqual)Status changes (at → status)
30fff9231fad757c061285e347b33c5149c2c2e4affectedgitd6ace0dbcbb7fd285738bb87b42b71b01858c952UnavailableNone listed
30fff9231fad757c061285e347b33c5149c2c2e4affectedgit2297e38114316b26ae02f2d205c49b5511c5ed55UnavailableNone listed
30fff9231fad757c061285e347b33c5149c2c2e4affectedgitf1bed05a832ae79be5f7a105da56810eaa59a5f1UnavailableNone listed
30fff9231fad757c061285e347b33c5149c2c2e4affectedgit18d84c45def3671d5c89fbdd5d4ab8a3217fe4b4UnavailableNone listed
30fff9231fad757c061285e347b33c5149c2c2e4affectedgit0a360f7f73a06ac88f18917055fbcc79694252d7UnavailableNone listed
30fff9231fad757c061285e347b33c5149c2c2e4affectedgite537dd15d0d4ad989d56a1021290f0c674dd8b28UnavailableNone listed

Linux

Vendor
Linux
Product
Linux
Platforms
Unknown
Default status
affected
Linux · Scoped product and version facts
Version (version)Status (status)Version scheme (versionType)Exclusive end (lessThan)Inclusive end (lessThanOrEqual)Status changes (at → status)
2.6.33affectedUnavailableUnavailableUnavailableNone listed
0unaffectedsemver2.6.33UnavailableNone listed
6.1.168unaffectedsemverUnavailable6.1.*None listed
6.6.131unaffectedsemverUnavailable6.6.*None listed
6.12.80unaffectedsemverUnavailable6.12.*None listed
6.18.21unaffectedsemverUnavailable6.18.*None listed
6.19.11unaffectedsemverUnavailable6.19.*None listed
7.0unaffectedoriginal_commit_for_fixUnavailable*None listed