cveboard RSS feed

CVE-2026-98536

CVE.org · Published

Historical CVEsJSONAI instructions

Record status
Published
Identifier year (not publication year)
2026
Source publication
Source updated
Imported by cveboard
Source snapshot
cve_2026-10-24_midnight_baseline ·

Plain text

CNA source text (English)

writeback: report a Tasks-RCU quiescent state per cgwb drain pass

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: writeback: report a Tasks-RCU quiescent state per cgwb drain pass cleanup_offline_cgwbs_workfn() drains a dying cgwb by calling cleanup_offline_cgwb() until it returns false, with a cond_resched() between passes. On a CONFIG_PREEMPTION kernel that cond_resched() does nothing: _cond_resched() is a plain "return 0", and under PREEMPT_DYNAMIC the full and lazy modes disable it. Since commit 7dadeaa6e851 ("sched: Further restrict the preemption modes") those are the only two models on the architectures with PREEMPT_LAZY support, arm64 and x86 among them, so the drain loop never reports a Tasks-RCU quiescent state. A worker draining a cgwb with millions of attached inodes runs for minutes. On a 6.18 arm64 host in lazy mode the cgwb worker drained one dying cgroup's writeback domain for over 11 minutes. A BPF program unlink (bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog -> bpf_trampoline_update -> unregister_ftrace_direct -> ftrace_shutdown -> synchronize_rcu_tasks()) waited on that grace period while holding the trampoline mutex, 42 tasks queued behind it in D state, and the hung task detector fired at 614 s and panicked the host. Any BPF or ftrace detach during a long drain inherits the drain's length. Fix this by calling cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs() so we do not stall out anybody who calls sycnrhonize_rcu_tasks(). We put this in a do { } while loop because if we have many small cgroups cleanup_offline_cgwb() will return false and we will never call cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs(), creating the same problem.

Scoped product and version facts

Fix information unknown; no fixed version is derived here. Missing information does not prove that no fix exists.

Exploitation unknown; this catalogue does not assess exploitation.

Linux

Vendor
Linux
Product
Linux
Platforms
Unknown
Default status
unaffected
Linux · Scoped product and version facts
Version (version)Status (status)Version scheme (versionType)Exclusive end (lessThan)Inclusive end (lessThanOrEqual)Status changes (at → status)
c22d70a162d3cc177282c4487be4d54876ca55c8affectedgit863049b4018237d1590cd13b16e9fe9c0faad2c6UnavailableNone listed
c22d70a162d3cc177282c4487be4d54876ca55c8affectedgit42462b5bb0dec57db7f85d0f77655c737d45754dUnavailableNone listed
c22d70a162d3cc177282c4487be4d54876ca55c8affectedgitebf1555ad2821be06f87a88ffd9a2cab8d2200e1UnavailableNone listed
c22d70a162d3cc177282c4487be4d54876ca55c8affectedgit4eb889649eaf65f4a5727b04ba1c017b7d05bb16UnavailableNone listed
c22d70a162d3cc177282c4487be4d54876ca55c8affectedgitfd3bf32279df98751364b3609eb100a3e42f253bUnavailableNone listed
c22d70a162d3cc177282c4487be4d54876ca55c8affectedgit260f586a80e7f624dd7f069898a75a904f34d373UnavailableNone listed
c22d70a162d3cc177282c4487be4d54876ca55c8affectedgit407a5d205179a4ab186571b0e16ec42725dc77bcUnavailableNone listed

Linux

Vendor
Linux
Product
Linux
Platforms
Unknown
Default status
affected
Linux · Scoped product and version facts
Version (version)Status (status)Version scheme (versionType)Exclusive end (lessThan)Inclusive end (lessThanOrEqual)Status changes (at → status)
5.14affectedUnavailableUnavailableUnavailableNone listed
0unaffectedsemver5.14UnavailableNone listed
5.15.222unaffectedsemverUnavailable5.15.*None listed
6.1.189unaffectedsemverUnavailable6.1.*None listed
6.6.158unaffectedsemverUnavailable6.6.*None listed
6.12.112unaffectedsemverUnavailable6.12.*None listed
6.18.55unaffectedsemverUnavailable6.18.*None listed
7.2.9unaffectedsemverUnavailable7.2.*None listed
7.3unaffectedoriginal_commit_for_fixUnavailable*None listed